
Testing Ranking Algorithms on CiteSeer Data
This article describes how various ranking algorithms have been tested to evaluate researchers based on the data from a digital library called CiteSeer. We apply
five well-known ranking methods such as citation counts,
HITS, or PageRank and seven other methods derived from
PageRank that take into account not only citation but also collaboration information to assess the importance of individual researchers. We compare the resulting rankings and show that some of them are highly correlated while others are not.
The available full text is a preprint of the article.
Keywords: CiteSeer, researchers, rankings, PageRank, correlation, convergence.
Year: 2013
Download:
Full text [397 kB]
