• Re: It's In The Name
> Self-awareness is the process of being aware of one's own state
> as part of a world, and the consequences of one's own actions
> on this world.
I don't find this definition at all useful. It is circular. It says little more than "Self-awareness is the process of being aware of self".
> ... but even simple reactive behaviours are good enough.
Do you mean that "simple reactive behaviours" are good enough to demonstrate self-awareness. In this case a chess playing program or a robot which looks for a socket to plug itself into when its battery is low already exhibit self-awareness.
> For computers, I'll have to think about a test, but you get the idea!
Getting the idea is not the point !! We all have ideas about self-awareness. However, relying on vague definitions, and appealing to intuition and introspection of other people is not very useful. Historically, intuition and introspection have proved notoriously unreliable ways of getting at the truth. Furthermore, if you want people to say how they expect self-awareness to be achieved it seems to me to be only reasonable that a way of testing any candidate computer program be provided.
Sincerely
GL7
|