![]()
Visiting guest. Why not sign in?
|
|
Reply to Message
Not registered yet?
The AI Depot has a focused community of friendly users. Rather than let anyone abuse the site at the brink of promiscuity, we prefer to let only those with an active interest participate... this simply requires registering.
Why not sign up!
Joining the site's community is completely free. You can then post messages freely, and customise your personal profile at will. Specific privileges will also be granted to you, like being able to access printer-friendly articles without restrictions. So, why not register?
Parent Message
Game Interface Standards
You shouldn't be able to get far without noticing this press release; Artificial Intelligence Interface Standards Committee to Enable Major Advances in Video Games. Basically, the idea -- supported by the independent game developer association -- is to draft common specifications to allow independent developers to work indirectly together. Here's the juicy bit: 'Working groups are formed to work on interface standards for specific game AI areas. These include: "path-finding", "steering", "decision trees", "finite state machines", "rule-based systems", "goal-oriented action planning", and "world interfacing". Working groups discuss requirements and case examples, develop and discuss potential solutions.' I was somewhat sceptical at first to be honest. Standards are not really the thing that's holding AI in games back, rather the attitude of developers toward it and their resilience to embrace academic approaches (with justifiable arguments). While I do believe the standards themselves will work in the long run, I think it may be a bit premature; still only few games heavily use AI, and picking out trends from them is not yet suitable. That said, this committee will encourage the discussion, and by the time a draft is ready, AI will have moved on a great deal! |
|
Back to the Artificial Intelligence Depot.